RECOGNITION OF A LANDSCAPE TECHNO-SPHERE AS A NEW GEOSPHERE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35433/naturaljournal.2.2023.85-94

Keywords:

landscape techno-sphere, engineering landscape science, anthropogenic landscapes, landscape-technical systems, techno-genesis.

Abstract

The second half of XX century – the beginning of XXI century are characterized by the active development of a global ecological crisis, which is described by a critical state of the environment and excessive anthropogenization of a geographical sphere. The changes which lead to the formation of absolutely new techno-genic landscapes occur at very fast rates in current geo-spheres. The purpose of the work is to substantiate the recognition of a new geo-sphere – a landscape technosphere – based on the previous experience and our field research. The main tasks of the research are to analyze specific features and properties of a landscape techno-sphere; to identify its upper and lower borders; to study a structural organization of all options of a landscape sphere with available techno-substances; to characterize briefly the main stages of the development of a technosphere. The research of a landscape techno-sphere is a complicated process and it is based on the use of classical and innovative methodological principles of contemporary geography. A parallel application of three scientific paradigms is the foundation: system, model and ecological. They do not contradict each other; they rather compliment the studying of the interaction between nature and engineering. A system approach allows considering a techno-sphere as a complicated system of a lower taxonomic range of a landscape sphere and a geographical sphere. The following generally accepted scientific methods are used in the paper: analysis, synthesis, comparison, generalization, systematization, induction and deductions. The article substantiates the existence of a new geosphere – the landscape techno-sphere, which is formed by the planetary set of landscape-technical systems. it is noted that it does not have a continuous distribution, but is constantly increasing in size and gradually goes beyond the landscape. The specific features and properties of the landscape techno-sphere are analyzed in detail. Taking into account the criterion of the presence of a zone of direct contract of three blocks of landscape-technical systems (managerial, technical and natural), the upper and lower limits of the landscape techno-sphere are identified. The structure of all variants of the landscape sphere in the presence of technological substances is considered. The main periods of development of the landscape techno-sphere are briefly described. It is concluded that man will never be able to control landscape-technical systems on a planetary scale. However, applying the methods and principles of engineering landscape research, it is possible to achieve optimal interaction of the three blocks of landscape-technical systems and to extend their functional suitability. 

References

Денисик Г. І., Воловик В. М. Нариси з антропогенного ландшафтознавства : навч. посіб. Вінниця : ГІПАНІС, 2001. 170 с.

Денисик Г. І. Антропогенне ландшафтознавство : навч. посіб. : в 2 ч. Вінниця : ПП «ТД Видавництво Едельвейс і К», 2012. Ч. І : Глобальне антропогенне ландшафтознавство. 306 с.

Кавалеров В. А. Від «техносфери» до «ноосфери»: філософсько-освітній аспект. Вісник НТУУ «КПІ». Серія : Філософія. Психологія. Педагогіка. 2011. № 3. С. 24–28.

Лаврик О. Д. Інженерне ландшафтознавство: сучасний стан і перспективи розвитку. Наукові записки Вінницького державного педагогічного університету імені Михайла Коцюбинського. Серія : Географія. 2016. Вип. 28, № 1–2. С. 10–17.

Лаврик О. Д. Ландшафтна техносфера. Науковий вісник Чернівецького національного університету імені Юрія Федьковича. Серія : Географія. 2018. Вип. 795. С. 147–154.

Мельник В., Маринюк В. Людина і технонаука в контексті ноосферної парадигми. Вісник Львівського національного університету. Серія : Філософські науки. 2013. № 16. С. 3–18.

Сова А. Вчення В. І. Вернадського про біосферу та перехід, становлення її в ноосферу. Вісник Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка. Серія : Геологія. 2013. Вип. 3. С. 47–50.

Cowie R. H., Bouchet Ph., Fontaine B. The Sixth Mass Extinction: fact, fiction or speculation? Biological Reviews. 2022. Vol. 97, Is. 2. P. 640–663. doi: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/brv.12816.

Fuchs K., Kozlovsky E. A., Krivtsov A. I., Zoback M. D. Super-Deep Continental Drilling and Deep Geophysical Sounding. Berlin : Springer Verlag, 1990. 452 р.

Haff P. K. Purpose in the Anthropocene: Dynamical role and physical basis. Anthropocene. 2016., Vol. 16. Р. 54–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2016.07.002.

Mendes J. R. Does the Sustainability of the Anthropocene Technosphere Imply an Existential Risk for Our Species? Thinking with Peter Haff. Social Sciences. 2021. Vol. 10, Is. 8, Р. 1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10080314.

Ness N. F., Burlaga L. F., Kurth W. S., Gurnett, D. A. In Situ Observations of Interstellar Plasma with Voyager 1. Science. 2013. Vol. 341, Is. 6153. Р. 1489–1492. doi : https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1241681.

The Biosphere and Noosphere Reader: Global Environment. Society and Change / edited by D. Pitt, P. R. Samson. Oxon : Routledge, 2012. 222 р.

Lahoz-Beltra R. The 'Crisis of Noosphere' as a Limiting Factor to Achieve the Point of Technological Singularity. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems. 2018. Vol. 16, Is. 1. P. 92–109. doi : 10.7906/indecs.16.1.7.

Zalasiewicz J., Williams M., Waters C. N. et al. Scale and diversity of the physical technosphere: A geological perspective. The Anthropocene Review. 2016. Vol. 4, Is. 1. Р. 9–22. doi : 10.1177/2053019616677743.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-04