PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS OF COMMON SPRING BARLEY WITH LOCAL APPLICATION OF SAPROPEL AT SOWING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/naturaljournal.15.2026.17Keywords:
spring barley, sapropel, in-row fertilizer application during sowing, organic growing technologyAbstract
Ukraine occupies a significant place in the world production of barley, exporting it to numerous countries of the African and Asian continents. In view of this, improving agricultural technologies for growing spring barley is an urgent task for both the scientific community and agricultural producers. Localized sowing application of organic fertilizers, in particular sapropel, can contribute not only to increasing the productivity of grain crops, but also have a beneficial effect on the ecological situation. The aim of this work was to establish the impact of sowing row application of sapropel at a dose of 100 kg/ha on the productivity of common spring barley under the conditions of an organic farming system in the Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine. During the three-year experimental period (2023–2025), the application of granulated sapropel at a dose of 100 kg/ha at sowing contributed to an increase in the plant viability index to the harvesting phase by 1–5%, the productive tillering index by 1–4%, and the number of grains in the ear by 2–3%. These favorable trends correlated with an increase in the biological yield of spring barley. On average, over three years of research, the local application of sapropel at sowing resulted in an increase in the biological yield of spring barley by 3-4 c/ha, which is an increase of 7 to 11% compared to the control variant, where sapropel was not applied. At the same time, the effect of sapropel application on the productive characteristics of spring barley demonstrated varietal specificity: the greatest yield increase after sapropel application was observed for the Komandor variety and amounted to 10–11%. Our results are consistent with previously documented data on the beneficial effect of sapropel substances on the culture of spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). This positive effect is probably due to the presence of humic compounds in the composition of sapropel, which are known for their biostimulating effect on plant organisms. In addition, local application of sapropel during sowing can contribute to the formation of an optimal microenvironment for the development of a symbiotic microbial community in the soil. The available data open up prospects for further research, namely, elucidation of the structure and taxonomic composition of microbial coenoses in the rhizosphere of spring barley, which are formed under the conditions of the application of sapropel during sowing.
References
Кирильчук А. М., Щербиніна Н. П., Чухлєб С. Л. Ячмінь – стан та шляхи збільшення виробництва зерна. Таврійський науковий вісник. 2023. № 131. С. 90–103. https://doi.org/10.32782/2226-0099.2023.131.11
Козак Н., Панахид Г. Комбіноване використання конюшини лучної в короткоротаційній сівозміні. Матеріали XV Міжнародної наукової конференції «Корми і кормовий білок» (19-20 вересня 2023 року). Інститут кормів та сільського господарства Поділля НААН. Вінниця. 2023. С. 86–89. https://doi.org/10.31073/kormovyrobnytstvo2023conf
Методика проведення кваліфікаційної експертизи сортів рослин на придатність до поширення в Україні. [Електронний ресурс]. URL: https://sops.gov.ua/uploads/page/5b7e5c0ed8332.pdf (дата звернення 04.12.2025).
Обсяг виробництва, урожайність та зібрана площа сільськогосподарських культур за їх видами по регіонах. [Електронний ресурс]. URL: https://stat.gov.ua/uk/releases/ploshchi-valovi-zbory-ta-urozhaynist-silskohospodarskykh-kultur (дата звернення 04.12.2025).
Основи наукових досліджень в агрономії / В.О. Єщенко, П.Г.Копитко, В.П. Опришко, П.В. Костогриз; За ред .В.О. Єщенка. Київ : Дія, 2005. 288 с.
Перелік допоміжних продуктів та методів, дозволених для використання в органічному виробництві 2024. Київ : ТОВ «Органік Стандарт», 2024. 150 с. [Електронний ресурс]. URL: https://organicstandard.ua/content/docs/catalogs/list_of_inputs_and_methods_ua.pdf (дата звернення 04.12.2025).
Стандарти. [Електронний ресурс]. URL: https://organicstandard.ua/standards (дата звернення 04.12.2025).
Ali M., Rahul F., Ali S. et al. Impact of organic amendments on soil structure, fertility and growth of plants. In: Kausar, R., Nisa, Z.U., Jamil, M. & Bashir, I. (eds). Integrated Health and Sustainability: Plants, Wildlife, and Genetic Resilience. Faisalabad : Unique Scientific Publishers. 2025. P. 183–189. https://doi.org/10.47278/book.HH/2025.295
Arthur G.D., Stirk W.A., Novák O., Hekera P., van Staden J. Occurrence of nutrients and plant hormones (cytokinins and IAA) in the water fern Salvinia molesta during growth and composting. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2007. №61. Р. 137–144. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.002
Grantina-Ievina L., Karlsons A., Andersone-Ozola U., Ievinsh G. Effect of freshwater sapropel on plants in respect to its growth-affecting activity and cultivable microorganism content. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture. 2014. №101(4). Р. 355–366. https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2014.101.045
Hrytsiuk N., Plotnytska N., Tymoshchuk T., Dovbysh L., Bondareva L. Influence of the tillage on weediness of winter wheat crops in conditions of Ukrainian Polissia. Scientific Horizons. 2020. 05 (90). Р. 15–21. https://doi.org/10.33249/2663-2144- 2020-90-5-15-21.
Jarukas L., Ivanauskas L., Kasparaviciene G., Baranauskaite J., Marksa M., Bernatoniene, J. Determination of organic compounds, fulvic acid, humic acid, and humin in peat and sapropel alkaline extracts. Molecules. 2021. №26(10). 2995. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26102995
Kaso T., Guben G. Review of Barley Value Chain Management in Ethiopia. Journal of Biology. Agriculture and Health care. 2015. № 5(10). P. 84–97. [Електронний ресурс]. URL: http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JBAH/article/view/22519/23177 (дата звернення 04.12.2025).
Klepeckas M., Januškaitienė I. Changes in Triticum aestivum and Hordeum vulgare chlorophyll content and fluorescence parameters under impact of various sapropel concentrations. Biologija. 2016. №62(4). Р. 216–226. https://doi.org/10.6001/biologija.v62i4.3409
Liužinas R., Jankevičius K., Šalkauskas M., Mikalajūnas M. 2005. Improvement of lake sapropel quality: a new method. Geografijos metraštis. 2005. №38. Р. 44–51. [Електронний ресурс]. URL: https://gamtostyrimai.lt/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/275_cd3745c8d557ffdbd1fd8c1950e00035.pdf (дата звернення 04.12.2025).
Lynge M., Lakkenborg Kristensen H., Grevsen K., Nygaard Sorensen J. Strategies for high nitrogen production and fertilizer value of plant-based fertilizers. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2022. 186 (1). P. 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.202200031
Murunga S.I., Wafula E.N., Sang J. The use of freshwater sapropel in agricultural production: A new frontier in Kenya. Advances in Agriculture. 2020. №1. 8895667. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8895667
Nazarova T.V., Dmitriyev P.S., Baryshnikov G.Y. Using the Extract of “Saprolin” for Enhancing Grain Crops. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021. №670(1). 012002. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/670/1/012002
Nsengumuremyi D., Adadi P., Ukolova M. V., Barakova N. V. Effects of ultradisperse humic sapropel suspension on microbial growth and fermentation parameters of barley distillate. Fermentation. 2019. №5(1). Р. 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation5010024
Reimer M., Møller H.B., Sørensen P. Utilization of cattle slurry, biogas digestates and separated digestates by injection to organically managed spring barley. European Journal of Agronomy. 2025. №164. 127457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2024.127457
Stankevica K., Vincevica-Gaile Z., Klavins M. Role of humic substances in agriculture and variability of their content in freshwater lake sapropel. Agronomy Research. 2019. №17(3). Р. 850–861. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.19.094
Wahid A., Gelani S., Ashraf M., Foolad M.R. Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environmental and experimental botany. 2007. №61(3). Р. 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.011
Xu D., Liu D., Tang Z., Yu G., Yuan J., Shen Q., Huang Q. Structure of chemical components in different compost extracts characterized by chromatogram and spectroscopy analysis and its influence on plant growth promotion. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. 2012. №14. Р. 325–333. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-012-0071-z





