PLANT COMMUNITIES OF THE ARTEMISIETEA VULGARIS IN SPONTANEOUS TERRAFORMING MODELS OF EXTRATERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/naturaljournal.17.2026.27Keywords:
invasive species, self-restoration of vegetation, space colonization, astroecology, ruderal communitiesAbstract
The article is devoted to the study of the prospects for using plant communities of the class for terraforming isolated extraterrestrial ecosystems. The study aims to determine the functional role of Artemisietea vulgaris vegetation within spontaneous terraforming models of extraterrestrial ecosystems. In accordance with the aim, the following tasks were set: to analyze the ecological spectrum of the Artemisietea vulgaris class vegetation; to establish the place of the plant communities of the class in models of vegetation restoration dynamics on substrates lunar regolith simulants. The materials of the study were standard geobotanical descriptions, based on which the classification of plant communities and synphytoindication analysis were carried out. During the study, it was determined that the Artemisietea vulgaris class vegetation in the territory of Ukrainian Polissya belongs to 2 orders, 5 unions, and 20 associations according to the Brown-Blanquet system classification. The limitation of the plant communities of Artemisietea vulgaris to certain types of habitats is noticeable at the level of unions. Plant communities of the Agropyrion repentis union are adapted to distribution on disturbed substrates with a minimum amount of nutrients. Plant communities of the Arction lappae union are more common in places where anthropogenic accumulation of organic and mineral substances occurs in combination with disturbances that suppress natural vegetation. The least humid ecotopes with the highest continentality indicators are occupied by the vegetation of the Dauco-Melilotion and Onopordion acanthii unions. Plant communities of the Rorippo austriacae-Falcarion vulgaris union are ruderal forest edges and ecotonic with groups of nitrophiles of the Galio-Urticetea class. According to the data of the synphytoindication analysis, plant communities of the class are formed under conditions of predominance of anthropogenic dynamics over autogenic. The average indicators of the level of anthropogenic transformation range from 9.39 points (Rorippo austriacae-Falcarion vulgaris union) to 10.30 points (Dauco-Melilotion union), which corresponds to the eugemerob level of anthropotolerance. Modeling by synphytoindication indicators indicates that the vegetation of the Artemisietea vulgaris class can form both on completely disturbed substrates with rock outcrops and on arable land. The next stage of positive autogenic succession will be the stage of shrubs (Rhamno-Prunetea class) or young derived forests (Robinietea class). The course of successions is influenced by edaphic conditions, seed diaspora, and the level of anthropogenic transformation.
References
Angelopoulos, V. (2011). The ARTEMIS mission. Space Science Reviews, 165(1), 3–25. [in English].
Antony Jose, S., Jackson, J., Foster, J., Silva, T., Markham, E., & Menezes, P. L. (2026). Assessing the metal and rare earth element mining potential of undifferentiated asteroids through the study of carbonaceous chondrites. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 545(1), 1902. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf1902 [in English].
Antony Jose, S., Jackson, J., Foster, J., Silva, T., Markham, E., & Menezes, P. L. (2025). In-space manufacturing: Technologies, challenges, and future horizons. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 9(3), 84. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2025-166146 [in English].
Béguin, C., Di Maio, E., & Theurillat, J. P. (2025). The nitrophilous vegetation of rock shelters on limestone in the Haut-Jura (Ain, France) in a European context. Tuexenia, 45, 185–212. https://doi.org/10.14471/2025.45.008 [in English].
Braun-Blanquet, J. (1964). Grundzüge der Vegetationskund. In J. Braun-Blanquet (Ed.), Pflanzensoziologie (865 р.). Verlag von Julius Springer. [in German]. Chirilă, S. D., Bănescu, A., Trifanov, C., Doroftei, M., & Covaliov, S. (2025). Vegetation, hydrological, and morphological dynamics of natural islands in the Danube Delta. Hacquetia, 24(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3986/hacq-2025-0019 [in English].
Coleine, C., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Rosado, A. S., & Zerboni, A. (2025). The role of extremophile microbiomes in terraforming Mars. Communications Biology, 8(1), 1588. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-08973-1 [in English].
Duri, L. G., Caporale, A. G., Rouphael, Y., Vingiani, S., Palladino, M., De Pascale, S., & Adamo, P. (2022). The potential for lunar and martian regolith simulants to sustain plant growth: A multidisciplinary overview. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 8, 747821. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2021.747821 [in English].
Ellery, A. (2021). Supplementing closed ecological life support systems with in-situ resources on the moon. Life, 11(8), 770. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11080770 [in English].
Fackrell, L. E., Humphrey, S., Loureiro, R., Palmer, A. G., & Long-Fox, J. (2024). Overview and recommendations for research on plants and microbes in regolith-based agriculture. Sustainable Agriculture, 2(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44204-024-00109-7 [in English].
Farrell, W. M., Prem, P., Hurley, D. M., Tucker, O. J., & Killen, R. M. (2024). Possible anthropogenic contributions to the LAMP-observed surficial icy regolith within lunar polar craters: A comparison of Apollo and Starship landings. The Planetary Science Journal, 5(5), 105. https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ad37f5 [in English].
Ferl, R. J., & Paul, A. L. (2010). Lunar plant biology – A review of the Apollo era. Astrobiology, 10(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1089/ast.2009.0416 [in English].
Gibson, E. K. (1977). Volatile elements, carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, sodium, potassium and rubidium in the lunar regolith. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 10, 57–62. [in English].
Heinicke, C., & Foing, B. A. (2021). Human habitats: Prospects for infrastructure supporting astronomy from the Moon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 379(2188), 20190568. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0568 [in English].
Hennekens, S. M. (Ed.). (2009). TURBOVEG for Windows (Version 2, 96 pp.). Inst. voor Bos en Natur. [in English].
Keeter, B. (2025). Scientists grow plants in lunar soil. NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). https://www.nasa.gov/feature/biological-physical/scientists-grow-plants-in-soilfrom- the-moon [in English].
Khomiak, I. V. (2025). Prospects and risks of using lunar regolith to form isolated ecosystems. Ukrainian Journal of Natural Sciences, (14), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.32782/naturaljournal. 14.2025.25 [in English].
Khomiak, I. V., Onyshchuk, I. P., & Vasylenko, O. M. (2024a). Theoretical basis of classification of terraforming methods. Ecological Sciences, (4[55]), 234–237. https://doi.org/10.32846/2306-9716/2024.eco.4-55.38 [in English].
Khomiak, I. V., Harbar, O., Kostiuk, V., Demchuk, N., & Vasylenko, O. (2024b). Synphytoindication models of the anthropogenic transformation of ecosystems. Natura Croatica: Periodicum Musei Historiae Naturalis Croatici, 33(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/110.20302/NC.2024.1.5 [in English].
Kozyrovska, N. O., Lutvynenko, T. L., Korniichuk, O. S., Kovalchuk, M. V., Voznyuk, T. M., & Kordium, V. A. (2006). Growing pioneer plants for a lunar base. Advances in Space Research, 37(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.07.085 [in English].
Krijnen, W. H. J., & Verwoert, M. R. (2014). Can plants grow on Mars and the Moon: A growth experiment on Mars and Moon soil simulants. PLOS One, 9(8), e103138. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103138 [in English].
Mosyakin, S. L., & Fedoronchuk, M. M. (1999). Vascular plants of Ukraine: A nomenclatural checklist. M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany. [in English].
Muszyński-Sulima, W. (2023). Cold War in space: Reconnaissance satellites and US-Soviet security competition. European Journal of American Studies, 18(18–20). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejas.20427 [in English].
Paul, A. L., Smith, D. P., Gigis, P. J., Ferl, J. B., & Ferl, R. L. (2022). Plants grown in Apollo lunar regolith present stress-associated transcriptomes that inform prospects for lunar exploration. Communications Biology, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03513-z [in English].
Przylibski, T. A., Szczęśniewicz, M., & Blutstein, K. (2025). Potential mineral resources of the Moon. Geological Quarterly, 69, 2–15. https://doi.org/10.7306/gq.1804 [in English].
Wahl, M. (2025). The militarization of space: The Cold War and the Space Race. Salve Regina University. [in English].
Zaets, I., Burlak, O., Rogutskyy, I., Vasilenko, A., Mytrokhyn, O., Lukashov, D., ... & Kozyrovska, N. (2011). Bioaugmentation in growing plants for lunar bases. Advances in Space Research, 47(6), 1071–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.05.011 [in English].
Zwierzyński, A. J., Ciążela, J., Boroń, P., & Binkowska, W. (2023). Lunar cold microtraps as future source of raw materials — business and technological perspective. Applied Sciences, 13(24),13030. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132413030 [in English].
Yakubenko, B. Ie., Popovych, S. Iu., Ustymenko, P. M., Dubyna, D. V., & Churilov, A. M. (2020). Heobotanika: metodychni aspekty doslidzhen [Geobotany: methodological aspects of research]. Dnipro : Lira-к, [in Ukrainian].
Dubyna, D.V., Dziuba, T.P., Yemelianova, S.M., Bahrikova, N.O., Borysova, O.V., Borsukevych, L.M., Vynokurov, D.S., Hapon, S.V., Hapon, Yu.V., Davydov, D.A., Dvoretskyi, T.V., Didukh, Ya.P., Zhmud, O.I., Kozyr, M.S., Konishchuk, V.V., Kuzemko, A.A., Pashkevych, N.A., Ryff, L.E., Solomakha, …& Yakushenko, D.M. (2019). Prodromus roslynnosti Ukrajiny [Prodromus vegetation of Ukraine]. Kyiv : Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
